proj-imim:
Re: DLL Viewer
Roberto Gomez Torres 2000-May-06 00:16:52
That idea is very nice.
A DLL should be great, but if the source code ( at least the basic panning )
could be released we can port it to applications like NeoBook, I-Shell
and/or Director as plug-ins or extras.
What do you think ?
========================
Roberto Gomez Torres.
Tiempo Digital.
Mexico City, Mexico
www.tiempo-digital.com
#removed#
========================
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Spikowski" <#removed#>
To: "PROJ-IMIM" <#removed#>
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 2:49 PM
Subject: DLL Viewer
> My vote is for a Windows DLL version of the viewer. I had asked Helmut
about
> this and he is concidering it. Most Windows based development languages
can
> call DLL's.
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: #removed#
> [mailto:#removed#]On Behalf Of Paul Ellis
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 3:22 AM
> To: #removed#; Immersive Imaging
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: PTViewer 0.9
>
>
> This is excellent stuff!
>
> I'm playing with some rather large images, which run much better in the
> native Viewer than the java version. However, the native viewer's static
> image rendering is not as good as the current java version.
>
> What would help me enormously right now is to bring the native image
quality
> up to the level of java's, and possibly add the option to save stand-alone
> in the "other platform" format, so that from the Mac I could save out a
> self-contained .exe for mailing to clients, and vice-versa. This facility
> would be extremely useful.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Ellis
> #removed#
> http://www.mnetwork.co.uk
>
>
>