proj-imim:
Re: PTVJ Psize Test
Gummy Bear 2000-May-19 21:32:41
Thanks for testing, but I think your connection
is too fast for you to be able to tell the difference.
I can only see the difference on my 56k dial-up account.
Anyway, I guess it's time to try PTViewer Java 1.0!
Maybe that will solve this problem for me.
If not, I will try updating to the latest Microsoft Java VM.
Perhaps there is a problem with the getImage() method
in the MS VM that I am using with Windows IE 5.
Best,
Gummy
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. Jackson (terra360.com)" <#removed#>
To: "Panorama Tools" <#removed#>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: PTVJ Psize Test
> MSIE 5.0 on Window 2000, DSL, 10 seconds for both.
>
> _________________
> R. Jackson
> #removed#
> http://www.terra360.com/
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gummy Bear
> To: Immersive Imaging
> Sent: May 19, 2000 11:20 AM
> Subject: PTVJ Psize Test
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to verify the slow download I'm getting on
> Windows IE 5 with PTVJ 0.9 with and without the psize
> parameter set in the HTML.
>
> Is there anyone on a windows machine with a *dial-up*
> connection that can test these URL's with IE 5?
>
> The first page has the psize set correctly in the HTML:
> http://mrgummybear.tripod.com/ptvj/psize.html
> This is typically taking 25-30 seconds to load on 56K modem.
>
> The second page is exactly the same but has the psize removed:
> http://mrgummybear.tripod.com/ptvj/nopsize.html
> This is typically taking 50-55 seconds to load on 56K modem.
>
> I start my count from the time I see "Loading Image..." in the applet.
>
> BTW, the maxarray param is set at 2,000,000 pixels which
> should be more than enough for this 640,000 pixel pano.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gummy
>
>