PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:proj-imim
Sender:
Date/Time:1970-Jan-01 01:00:00
Subject:jpeg 2000

Thread:


proj-imim: jpeg 2000 1970-Jan-01 01:00:00
> I did some subjective tests a while back with the then current jpeg
> 2000 codec, but I typically only got 15-20% improvement in file
> size over the standard jpeg codec in use today.  

This is a disappointment. 

Did you try streaming it over the web? I had been told that the wavelet 
format of JPEG 2000 would provide a nice streaming preview of the image 
that would refine as it downloaded but would show you something after 
the first 4k or
so.



Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page