Mailinglist: | proj-imim |
Sender: | |
Date/Time: | 1970-Jan-01 01:00:00 |
Subject: | jpeg 2000 |
> I did some subjective tests a while back with the then current jpeg > 2000 codec, but I typically only got 15-20% improvement in file > size over the standard jpeg codec in use today. This is a disappointment. Did you try streaming it over the web? I had been told that the wavelet format of JPEG 2000 would provide a nice streaming preview of the image that would refine as it downloaded but would show you something after the first 4k or so.