PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools
Sender:panoramicsdk
Date/Time:2006-Mar-03 10:56:07
Subject:Re: "Brocap" integration - please test

Thread:


PanoTools: Re: "Brocap" integration - please test panoramicsdk 2006-Mar-03 10:56:07
--- In #removed#, "peter_winkler_01" <winkler@...> wrote:
> > BAD BAD BAD
> > Very Bad idea
> > Forget everything abut script like this.
> > If you want to use different plugins it is the user who should Choose.

> As the last postings about usability testing panorama content stated,
> the most users don't care about the used technology and are 
> rather confused if they click on another plugin symbol and 
> get the same pano with no visible differences. (for them)
> 
> Of course this is different in the pano community, but these are not
> the clients which pay the invoices.

There is a large difference between Bernard site. and some 680x480 Real Estate 
panoramas which is what this was developed for.

Quicktime - SPiV and DevalVR are very different in performance.
You have viewers who have a 500mhz PC with a 4 mb videocard, others have a super 
computer with 256mb video.
And also the different plugins demands different amounts of RAM.
People do not have 4 gb ram as many of us have.

You have to let the viewer test and decide what works best for him.

Hans






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoTools/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page