PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools
Sender:John Spikowski
Date/Time:2006-Mar-03 12:07:30
Subject:RE: Re: "Brocap" integration - please test

Thread:


PanoTools: RE: Re: "Brocap" integration - please test John Spikowski 2006-Mar-03 12:07:30
85% of the cars I have owned over the years have been standard (stick shift)
models. I also use VMWare for the same reason. Choice rules over convenience
in my book.

Brocap reminds me of the IPIX/HomeStore image server concept.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: #removed# 
> [mailto:#removed#] On Behalf Of panoramicsdk
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:52 AM
> To: #removed#
> Subject: [PanoTools] Re: "Brocap" integration - please test
> 
> --- In #removed#, "Erik Krause" 
> <erik.krause@...> wrote:
> 
> > I agree. BUT: First of all it should be known what technologies are 
> > available on client side. This is the job Brocap does. If Bernhard 
> > choose to automatically use one of the installed technologies it is 
> > his concern. There is always the possibility to show a list of 
> > available viewers.
> > 
> > However, the average arm chair travel user does not want to bother 
> > with viewer technologies, he wants to view locations - conveniently 
> > and in the best available quality.
> 
> To choose a viewer is something everyone on the net is used to.
> Almost all large news site with videos gives you the choise 
> to use WMP - Real and sometimes Quicktime.
> And they never do this choise automatically. 
> 
> To choose a viewer is a natural thing and we have to educate 
> people that we have different technologies also for VR. 
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoTools/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page